Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FDND vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FDND paid 7.1% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, though JULH returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

7.1%FDND cash paid, 1 year
4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
−0.6%FDND total return, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JULH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FDND 21.4JULH 35.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FDND14.1 pts behind DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIA
JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDND and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FDNDOnly in JULH
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66%
Netflix, Inc. 5.90%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FDND and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FDNDJULHFDNDJULHFDNDJULH
3 months+8.9%+1.8%2.0%1.1%+8.5 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+18.8%+4.0%4.3%2.7%+4.8 pts−14.0 pts
1 year−0.6%+4.5%7.1%4.7%−14.1 pts−12.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 pts
Since launch+34.3%+22.7%20.4%18.6%−0.5 pts−55.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FDND and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Strategyoption incomedefined income
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized7.8%4.2%
Expense ratio0.75%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year7.1%4.7%
Price change, 1 year−8.2%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year−0.6%+4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−14.1 pts−12.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age911 days1173 days
Net assets$10m$17m

FDND in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FDND or JULH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so FDND paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or JULH?
With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JULH returned more.
Which is cheaper, FDND or JULH?
FDND charges 0.75% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDND against JULH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources