Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

APRH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against APRH’s 6.4%, though APRH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about APRH and MAGY

Net assets: $25m on Nov 3, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
6.4%
APRH cash paid, 1 year
24.0%
MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+6.8%
APRH total return, 1 year
−1.5%
MAGY total return, 1 year
APRH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8 pts behind SPY
APRH
+6.8%
SPY
+14.8%

8 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

APRH

+6.8%

6.4% of it arrived as cash

8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8 pts behind SPY

APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

APRH

+6.8%

8 pts behind SPY

6.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.2%, total +6.8%, SPY +14.8%, −8.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY
−1.5%
MAGS
+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

APRH costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; MAGY is 3.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

APRH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureAPRHMAGY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+6.8%−1.5%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.2%fell 26.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate65% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYMagnificent Seven, measured through MAGS
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 8.0 ptsbehind by 7.8 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.99%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$25m$92m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · APRH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score62.6APRH17.1MAGY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, APRH and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first APRH MAGY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in APRH
Only in MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%
MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
Strategy defined income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Pays quarterly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 8.4% 25.1%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.4% 24.0%
Price change, 1 year +0.2% −26.1%
Total return, 1 year +6.8% −1.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +6.3%
Ahead or behind −8.0 pts −7.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 65% 100%
Age 3.6 years 1.5 years
Net assets, APRH as of Nov 3, 2026 and MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 $25m $94m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: APRH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAPRHMAGYAPRHMAGYAPRHMAGY
3 months+1.1%+4.0%2.1%5.4%+1.2 pts+1.2 pts
6 months+2.9%+0.8%4.1%11.3%−2.1 pts−1.8 pts
1 year+6.8%−1.5%6.4%24.0%−8.0 pts−7.8 pts
3 years+22.4%–20.1%–−60.5 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: APRH Apr 2023 · MAGY Apr 2025+29.2%+25.7%24.3%44.0%−65.7 pts−37.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

APRH and MAGY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
APRH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APRH or MAGY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.8% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, APRH or MAGY?
APRH charges 0.79% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so APRH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, APRH against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-magy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.