Data as of .
APLY vs XYLD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year APLY paid 32.4% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 11.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLD scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, APLY and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in APLY | Only in XYLD |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 27.23% | NVIDIA CORP 8.01% |
| TREASURY BILL 19.97% | APPLE INC 7.39% |
| TREASURY BILL 19.80% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.58% |
| TREASURY BILL 19.47% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.81% |
| TREASURY BILL 13.52% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.01% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.60% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.40% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APLY | XYLD | APLY | XYLD | APLY | XYLD | |
| 3 months | +8.2% | +5.0% | 8.3% | 2.6% | −6.1 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +21.6% | +10.5% | 18.2% | 5.5% | −11.4 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 1 year | +26.4% | +17.9% | 32.4% | 11.0% | −18.6 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 3 years | +52.2% | +43.2% | 69.8% | 32.9% | −38.8 pts | −32.8 pts |
| Since launch | +55.8% | +190.8% | 74.3% | 112.9% | −47.0 pts | −133.7 pts |
| APLY YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying weekly | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF Covered call on ACWI, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Global X |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Apple (AAPL) | All-country world (ACWI) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.8% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 1.04% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 32.4% | 11.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | −9.6% | +5.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.4% | +17.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +45.0% | +19.1% |
| Ahead or behind | −18.6 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 84% | 93% |
| Age | 1242 days | 4827 days |
APLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. Apple (AAPL) returned +45.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +19.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, APLY or XYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.0%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or XYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +26.4% and XYLD returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so APLY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, APLY or XYLD?
- APLY charges 1.04% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against XYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aply-vs-xyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.