Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMZY vs APLY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year AMZY paid 35.9% of its price in cash against APLY’s 32.4%, though APLY returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

35.9%AMZY cash paid, 1 year
32.4%APLY cash paid, 1 year
+7.7%AMZY total return, 1 year
+26.4%APLY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: AMZY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

AMZY 56.5APLY 45.99.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AMZY4 pts behind AMZN · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN+11.7%AMZY+7.7%35.9% as cash4 pts behind AMZNTotal return, distributions reinvestedAMZN+11.7%AMZY+7.7%4 pts behind AMZN
APLY18.6 pts behind AAPL · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% of it arrived as cash18.6 pts behind AAPLTotal return, distributions reinvestedAAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% cash18.6 pts behind AAPL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AMZY and APLY hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AMZY and APLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAMZYAPLY
TREASURY BILL28.22%19.97%
TREASURY BILL27.36%19.80%
TREASURY BILL29.93%19.47%
TREASURY BILL8.79%13.52%
TREASURY BILL5.70%27.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

AMZY and APLY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
AMZYAPLYAMZYAPLYAMZYAPLY
3 months+7.2%+8.2%9.6%8.3%−0.5 pts−6.1 pts
6 months+19.1%+21.6%23.2%18.2%−4.6 pts−11.4 pts
1 year+7.7%+26.4%35.9%32.4%−4.0 pts−18.6 pts
3 years+70.6%+52.2%97.3%69.8%−11.2 pts−38.8 pts
Since launch+88.3%+55.8%107.5%74.3%−10.6 pts−47.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMZY and APLY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMZY
YieldMax(R) AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on AMZN, paying weekly
APLY
YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkAmazon (AMZN)Apple (AAPL)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized25.3%19.8%
Expense ratio1.09%1.04%
Cash paid, 1 year35.9%32.4%
Price change, 1 year−30.5%−9.6%
Total return, 1 year+7.7%+26.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.7%+45.0%
Ahead or behind−4.0 pts−18.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate34%84%
Age1144 days1242 days

AMZY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AMZY paid 35.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Amazon (AMZN) returned +11.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 34% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. Apple (AAPL) returned +45.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, AMZY or APLY?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AMZY paid 35.9% of its starting price in cash and APLY paid 32.4%, so AMZY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, AMZY or APLY?
With every distribution reinvested, AMZY returned +7.7% and APLY returned +26.4% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so APLY returned more.
Which is cheaper, AMZY or APLY?
AMZY charges 1.09% a year and APLY charges 1.04%, so APLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMZY against APLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZY against APLY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amzy-vs-aply Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources