AHD vs CAIE: which paid, and which earned it?

AHD and CAIE both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF.

10.1%
AHD cash paid, since launch
14.0%
CAIE cash paid, 1 year
+17.7%
AHD total return, since launch
+11.8%
CAIE total return, 1 year
AHD · since launch to Sep 30, 202634 pts behind HOOD
AHD
+17.7%
HOOD
+51.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

10.1% as cash

34 pts behind HOOD

Total return, distributions reinvested

34 pts behind HOOD

AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

HOOD

+51.7%

AHD

+17.7%

34 pts behind HOOD

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AHD since launch: paid 10.1%, price +6.9%, total +17.7%, HOOD +51.7%, −34.0 pts.

CAIE · 1 year to Sep 30, 20263.9 pts behind SPY
CAIE
+11.8%
SPY
+15.7%

3.9 pts behind SPY

CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

CAIE

+11.8%

14.0% as cash

3.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.9 pts behind SPY

CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

CAIE

+11.8%

3.9 pts behind SPY

14.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +51.7%. CAIE over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −3.1%, total +11.8%, SPY +15.7%, −3.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAHDCAIEAHDCAIEAHDCAIE
3 months+9.1%+0.9%5.1%2.3%+5.5 pts−1.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+13.2%not published6.3%not published−3.8 pts
1 yearnot published+11.8%not published14.0%not published−3.9 pts
Since launch
AHD May 2026 · CAIE Jun 2025
+17.7%+26.1%10.1%18.1%−34.0 pts−1.2 pts

AHD and CAIE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AHD
GraniteShares Autocallable HOOD ETF · Autocallable on HOOD, paying monthly
CAIE
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer GraniteShares Calamos
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Robinhood (HOOD) S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 32.6% 14.1%
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.74%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.1% (since launch on May 19, 2026) 14.0%
Price change, 1 year +6.9% −3.1%
Total return, 1 year +17.7% (since launch on May 19, 2026) +11.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +51.7% +15.7%
Ahead or behind −34.0 pts −3.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 17% not published
Age 134 days 462 days
Net assets $3m $872m

AHD and CAIE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AHD in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, AHD paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.7%. Robinhood (HOOD) returned +51.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 34.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.6%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 17% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

CAIE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, CAIE paid 14.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.9 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, AHD or CAIE?
AHD charges 1.07% a year and CAIE charges 0.74%, so CAIE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AHD against CAIE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ahd-vs-caie

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.