AAPW vs AAPY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year AAPW paid 27.9% of its price in cash against AAPY’s 12.8%, and returned more with it reinvested. Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF.

27.9%
AAPW cash paid, 1 year
12.8%
AAPY cash paid, 1 year
+32.9%
AAPW total return, 1 year
+30.6%
AAPY total return, 1 year
AAPW · 1 year to Sep 30, 20261.6 pts ahead of AAPL
AAPW
+32.9%
AAPL
+31.3%

1.6 pts ahead of AAPL

AAPW over 1 year: paid 27.9%, price −0.6%, total +32.9%, AAPL +31.3%, +1.6 pts.

AAPL

+31.3%

AAPW

+32.9%

27.9% of it arrived as cash

1.6 pts ahead of AAPL

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.6 pts ahead of AAPL

AAPW over 1 year: paid 27.9%, price −0.6%, total +32.9%, AAPL +31.3%, +1.6 pts.

AAPL

+31.3%

AAPW

+32.9%

27.9% as cash

1.6 pts ahead of AAPL

27.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. AAPW over 1 year: paid 27.9%, price −0.6%, total +32.9%, AAPL +31.3%, +1.6 pts.

AAPY · 1 year to Sep 30, 20260.7 pts behind AAPL
AAPY
+30.6%
AAPL
+31.3%

0.7 pts behind AAPL

AAPY over 1 year: paid 12.8%, price +15.5%, total +30.6%, AAPL +31.3%, −0.7 pts.

AAPL

+31.3%

AAPY

+30.6%

12.8% of it arrived as cash

0.7 pts behind AAPL

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.7 pts behind AAPL

AAPY over 1 year: paid 12.8%, price +15.5%, total +30.6%, AAPL +31.3%, −0.7 pts.

AAPL

+31.3%

AAPY

+30.6%

0.7 pts behind AAPL

12.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +32.9%. AAPY over 1 year: paid 12.8%, price +15.5%, total +30.6%, AAPL +31.3%, −0.7 pts.

ETFIQ Return Stability Score · AAPW scores higherWas the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
7.2, the lowest in this set97.2, the highest

A percentile among the 70 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AAPW and AAPY hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

half

41% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding AAPW AAPY
TREASURY BILL 85.68% 41.49%
Only in AAPW
Apple Inc 14.32%
Only in AAPY
TREASURY BILL 34.20%
TREASURY BILL 24.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAAPWAAPYAAPWAAPYAAPWAAPY
3 months+15.0%+13.2%7.4%3.0%+1.8 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+35.6%+32.2%16.2%7.0%+5.1 pts+1.7 pts
1 year+32.9%+30.6%27.9%12.8%+1.6 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch
AAPW Feb 2025 · AAPY Oct 2023
+34.7%+68.6%39.0%42.7%−2.2 pts−32.0 pts

AAPW and AAPY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

AAPW
Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF · Option income on AAPL, paying weekly
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF · Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying monthly
Issuer Roundhill Kurv
Strategy option income synthetic covered call
Benchmark Apple (AAPL) Apple (AAPL)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 29.0% 10.9%
Expense ratio 1.00% 0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year 27.9% 12.8%
Price change, 1 year −0.6% +15.5%
Total return, 1 year +32.9% +30.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year +31.3% +31.3%
Ahead or behind +1.6 pts −0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 83%
Age 588 days 1069 days
Net assets $42m $8m

AAPW and AAPY on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

AAPW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, AAPW paid 27.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Apple (AAPL) returned +31.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.0%, paid weekly.

AAPY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, AAPY paid 12.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 15.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +30.6%. Apple (AAPL) returned +31.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.9%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Aug 20, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, AAPW or AAPY?
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, AAPW paid 27.9% of its starting price in cash and AAPY paid 12.8%, so AAPW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, AAPW or AAPY?
With every distribution reinvested, AAPW returned +32.9% and AAPY +30.6% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, AAPW or AAPY?
AAPW charges 1.00% a year and AAPY charges 0.99%, so AAPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, AAPW against AAPY, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aapw-vs-aapy

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.