Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FHDG vs SQBA: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 FHDG can fall 1.1% before its buffer engages and SQBA 0.8%.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF.

1.1%FHDG can fall this far before its buffer
0.8%SQBA can fall this far before its buffer
2.7%FHDG can still gain
1.8%SQBA can still gain

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: SQBA scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

FHDG 10.6SQBA 84.30.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FHDGBetween buffer and cap
7.5 pts of buffer−7.5% floor0% period start+3.9% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%7.5 pts−7.5% floor0% start+3.9% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%
SQBABetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer−15.0% floor0% period start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%15 pts of buffer−15.0% floor0% start+2.6% capTODAY · SPY +1.1%

Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

FHDG resets first, on Nov 20, 2026, 60 days from now; SQBA runs to Nov 20, 2026, 60 days. FHDG can still gain 2.7% before its cap, SQBA 1.8%. A fall from here reaches FHDG’s buffer after 1.1% and SQBA’s after 0.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

FHDG and SQBA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
FHDGSQBAFHDGSQBA
3 months+2.4%not published+0.2 ptsnot published
6 months+10.3%not published−7.7 ptsnot published
1 year+13.0%not published−3.6 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FHDG and SQBA on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FHDG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 8% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 3.9%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026
SQBA
FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 15 Buffer ETF
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 2.6%, over a period ending Nov 20, 2026
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer8%15%
Outcome periodAug 24, 2026 to Nov 20, 2026Aug 24, 2026 to Nov 20, 2026
Days left6060
Starting cap+3.9%+2.6%
Can still gain2.7%1.8%
Fall before buffer1.1%0.8%
Protection left, index points7.5% of 7.5%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+1.1%+1.1%
Fund return this period+0.9%+0.6%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.85%
Net assets$76m$3m

FHDG in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 7.5% of the 7.5% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 60 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Nov 20, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SQBA in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 1.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, FHDG or SQBA?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, FHDG can gain about 2.7% before its cap and SQBA about 1.8%, so FHDG has more room left this period.
Which resets first, FHDG or SQBA?
FHDG ends its outcome period on Nov 20, 2026 and SQBA on Nov 20, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, FHDG or SQBA?
FHDG charges 0.85% a year and SQBA charges 0.85%, so FHDG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FHDG against SQBA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FHDG against SQBA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/fhdg-vs-sqba Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources