Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

XBI vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XBI returned +41.2% to XLG's +6.4%, and XLG charges 0.20% to XBI's 0.35%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about XBI and XLG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $10.3bn for State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+41.2%
XBI total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.35%
XBI expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLG costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.8 points; XLG is 1.2 times larger.

XBI vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureXBIXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+41.2%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high8.9%, high on Feb 8, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksBiotechS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$10.3bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund18%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, XBI and XLG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first XBI XLG
ABBVIE INC 1.67% 1.21%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in XBI
MODERNA INC 2.24%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP 1.86%
NATERA INC 1.82%
BIOGEN INC 1.75%
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS INC 1.75%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP 1.71%
AMGEN INC 1.68%
SPYRE THERAPEUTICS INC 1.67%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Thematic ETF Stock ETF
What it is Biotech Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +41.2% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 13.2% 98.4%
Holdings 165 53
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $10.3bn $11.9bn

XBI and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XBI and XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
XBI

By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +41.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Are XBI and XLG in the same category?
XBI is a thematic ETF and XLG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, XBI or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, XBI returned +41.2% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, XBI or XLG?
XLG is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do XBI and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 13% of XBI and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, XBI against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/xbi-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.