Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

USMV vs XRT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, USMV returned +10.8% to XRT's +2.4%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about USMV and XRT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $24.1bn for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF and $362m for State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF.

At a glance
+10.8%
USMV total return, 1 year
+2.4%
XRT total return, 1 year
0.15%
USMV expense ratio
0.35%
XRT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

USMV costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; USMV is far larger, $24.1bn against $362m.

USMV vs XRT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureUSMVXRT
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.8%+2.4%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Nov 16, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) IndexS&P Retail Select Industry Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$24.1bn$362m
Holdings
Holdings in common4%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.8%16.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

4%

By the books each fund has filed, USMV and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first USMV XRT
TJX 0.95% 1.52%
AUTOZONE 0.74% 1.47%
WALMART 0.73% 1.54%
OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 0.69% 1.42%
KROGER 0.63% 1.59%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.50% 1.50%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.13% 1.37%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in USMV
MICROSOFT 1.61%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.54%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.50%
CHUBB 1.50%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 1.48%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 1.47%
NVIDIA 1.47%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.44%
Only in XRT
KOHLS CORP 1.85%
MAPLEBEAR INC 1.76%
BATH + BODY WORKS INC 1.69%
ETSY INC 1.68%
VICTORIA S SECRET + CO 1.66%
BJ S WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS 1.62%
GAMESTOP CORP CLASS A 1.60%
OLLIE S BARGAIN OUTLET HOLDI 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF XRT State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor Tracks the S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year +10.8% +2.4%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 93.0% 22.5%
Holdings 176 74
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $24.1bn $362m

USMV and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

USMV and XRT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
USMV

USMV tracks the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 176 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%.

XRT

XRT tracks the S&P Retail. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, USMV or XRT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USMV returned +10.8% and XRT +2.4%.
Which is cheaper, USMV or XRT?
USMV is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do USMV and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of USMV and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, USMV against XRT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/usmv-vs-xrt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.