Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs XLY: how they differ

SDY and XLY hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SDY returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and XLY hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYXLY
MCDONALD S CORP1.17%4.09%
NIKE INC CL B1.53%1.15%
LOWE S COS INC0.96%2.88%
GENUINE PARTS CO0.78%0.48%
BEST BUY CO INC0.65%0.45%
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.12%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in XLY
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.33%AMAZON.COM INC 24.68%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 2.94%TESLA INC 17.84%
REALTY INCOME CORP 2.12%HOME DEPOT INC 5.31%
CHEVRON CORP 2.09%BOOKING HOLDINGS INC 3.52%
PEPSICO INC 1.95%TJX COMPANIES INC 3.44%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.82%STARBUCKS CORP 2.96%
TARGET CORP 1.74%GENERAL MOTORS CO 2.03%
KENVUE INC 1.48%DOORDASH INC A 1.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SDY and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+11.0%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings15749

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 68.7%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or XLY?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and XLY returned −4.1%, so SDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or XLY?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against XLY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdy-vs-xly Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources