Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs SPYM: how they differ

SDY and SPYM hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and SPYM returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPYM hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and SPYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYSPYM
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP1.42%1.04%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON0.97%0.98%
ABBVIE INC1.22%0.69%
CHEVRON CORP2.09%0.61%
MICROSOFT CORP0.54%5.58%
COCA COLA CO/THE1.23%0.52%
PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE1.26%0.51%
WALMART INC0.37%0.71%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC0.74%0.36%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.21%0.34%
LINDE PLC0.49%0.33%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC3.33%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in SPYM
RPM INTERNATIONAL INC 0.57%NVIDIA CORP 8.07%
GRACO INC 0.56%APPLE INC 7.32%
CARLISLE COS INC 0.54%AMAZON.COM INC 3.76%
ROYAL GOLD INC 0.53%ALPHABET INC CL A 2.98%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS 0.53%BROADCOM INC 2.61%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC 0.50%ALPHABET INC CL C 2.38%
EQUITY LIFESTYLE PROPERTIES 0.50%META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.16%
UMB FINANCIAL CORP 0.44%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SDY and SPYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
SPYM
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.35%1.30%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings157507

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYM in plain words

SPYM is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 38.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPYM?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPYM returned +17.6%, so SPYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or SPYM?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPYM charges 1.30%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and SPYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against SPYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPYM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdy-vs-spym Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources