Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs SPHQ: how they differ

SDY and SPHQ hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and SPHQ hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and SPHQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYSPHQ
PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE1.26%2.86%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING1.47%1.06%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP1.23%1.02%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A2.94%0.96%
QUALCOMM INC0.89%2.51%
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS1.02%0.77%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC0.74%2.11%
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC0.69%0.73%
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE0.66%0.73%
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO0.98%0.64%
FASTENAL CO0.95%0.52%
CINTAS CORP0.46%0.63%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in SPHQ
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.33%Mastercard Inc 5.78%
REALTY INCOME CORP 2.12%Visa Inc 5.68%
CHEVRON CORP 2.09%Apple Inc 5.60%
PEPSICO INC 1.95%Lam Research Corp 4.10%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.82%Netflix Inc 4.00%
TARGET CORP 1.74%GE Vernova Inc 3.92%
NIKE INC CL B 1.53%General Electric Co 3.62%
KENVUE INC 1.48%Cisco Systems Inc 3.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SDY and SPHQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetInvesco
What it isSPDR S&P DividendS&P 500 Quality
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%99.9%
Holdings157100

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPHQ in plain words

SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 43.4%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or SPHQ?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or SPHQ?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against SPHQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against SPHQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdy-vs-sphq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources