Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MOAT vs XLG: how they differ
MOAT and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MOAT | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| Veeva Systems Inc 3.41% | NVIDIA Corp 12.79% |
| Airbnb Inc 2.88% | Apple Inc 11.58% |
| Microsoft Corp 2.79% | Microsoft Corp 8.83% |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.75% | Amazon.com Inc 5.95% |
| Lpl Financial Holdings Inc 2.73% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.58% | Broadcom Inc 4.12% |
| Nvidia Corp 2.58% | Alphabet Inc 3.77% |
| Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The 2.52% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Invesco |
| What it is | Morningstar Wide Moat | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.46% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 55 | 52 |
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 27.1%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MOAT or XLG?
- MOAT charges 0.46% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MOAT and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources