Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and VPL

Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.6 points; MBB is 4.0 times larger.

MBB vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$36.2bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB not measured
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.07%
Holdings 10813 2343
Net assets, MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $35.5bn $9.0bn

MBB and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or VPL?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.