Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWD vs XLB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to XLB's +18.5%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWD and XLBNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $83.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and $8.1bn for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLB costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.0 points; IWD is 10.2 times larger.
| Measure | IWD | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.5% | +18.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Value Index | Materials Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $83.0bn | $8.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.6% | 58.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and XLB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWD and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.
XLB
XLB tracks an index of Materials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or XLB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and XLB +18.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or XLB?
- XLB is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWD against XLB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-xlb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWD against XLB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-xlb
[IWD against XLB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-xlb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.