Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs PDBC: how they differ
IWD and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IWD | Only in PDBC |
|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC 6.04% | Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 75.58% |
| APPLE 5.83% | POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 24.42% |
| MICROSOFT 4.93% | |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.54% | |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.54% | |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.85% | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.73% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 1.23% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +55.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | +37.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 814 | 2 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 814 positions, with the top ten at 29.0%.
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or PDBC?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or PDBC?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and PDBC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 0% of PDBC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against PDBC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources