Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWD vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWD returned +27.5% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWD and PDBC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $83.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWD costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.1 points; IWD is 10.4 times larger.
| Measure | IWD | PDBC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +27.5% | +55.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Value Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $83.0bn | $8.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 90% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWD and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.
PDBC
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or PDBC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.5% and PDBC +55.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or PDBC?
- IWD is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWD against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-pdbc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWD against PDBC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-pdbc
[IWD against PDBC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-pdbc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.