Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ITOT vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ITOT returned +13.4% to IWB's +13.1%; 95% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ITOT and IWB
Net assets: $97.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
ITOT costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; ITOT is 2.0 times larger.
| Measure | ITOT | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Total Market Index (TMI) | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $96.5bn | $48.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.9% | 35.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jan 30, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,186 weekly returnsIWB returned slightly more: +909.4% to +886.3%. ITOT and IWB swung about the same: 17.3% and 17.4%. ITOT and IWB fell about the same at their worst: −54.7% and −54.8%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | ITOT | IWB | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +886.3% | +909.4% | IWB (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +10.6% | +10.7% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +567.2% | +583.0% | IWB (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.3% | 17.4% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.2% | 12.3% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −54.7% | −54.8% | Tie | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.56 | 0.57 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.80 | 0.80 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.19 | 0.19 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,186 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and IWB hold 95% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
95% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ITOT and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT and IWB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. ITOT follows S&P Total Market Index (TMI) and IWB follows Russell 1000 Index.
- Cost. ITOT charges 0.03% of assets a year and IWB 0.15%, a gap of 0.12 points.
- Holdings in common (similar). 95% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
ITOT
ITOT tracks the S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,443 positions, with the top ten at 33.9%.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +13.4% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ITOT or IWB?
- ITOT is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ITOT against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ITOT against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-iwb
[ITOT against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/itot-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.