Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ILF vs IWO: how they differ
ILF and IWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.
iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ILF | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| USD CASH | 0.53% | 0.14% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.31% | 0.11% |
| Only in ILF | Only in IWO |
|---|---|
| NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61% | MOOG INC CLASS A 0.69% |
| VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00% | GLAUKOS 0.65% |
| ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71% | JFROG 0.64% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.62% |
| GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02% | FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC 0.62% |
| PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94% | BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61% |
| GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24% | INTERDIGITAL INC 0.60% |
| CREDICORP LTD 3.85% | KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF | IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Latin America 40 | Russell 2000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +33.4% | +17.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.9 pts | −0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 47 | 970 |
ILF in plain words
ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 970 positions, with the top ten at 6.2%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWO?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and IWO returned +17.0%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or IWO?
- ILF charges 0.47% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so IWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ILF and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against IWO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources