Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ILF vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to IWB's +13.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ILF and IWB
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.5bn for iShares Latin America 40 ETF and $49.1bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; IWB is 14.0 times larger.
| Measure | ILF | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P Latin America 40 | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $3.5bn | $49.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 55.6% | 35.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ILF and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF
ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ILF or IWB?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ILF against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ILF against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwb
[ILF against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.