Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYG vs XLF: how they differ
HYG and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLF returned more over the year.
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HYG and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HYG | Only in XLF |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.68% | JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.81% |
| 1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 11.59% |
| MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.47% | VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 7.60% |
| PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.35% | MASTERCARD INC A 5.69% |
| WULF COMPUTE LLC 144A 0.29% | BANK OF AMERICA CORP 5.09% |
| GALAXY HELIOS DATA CENTERS II LLC 144A 0.28% | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.75% |
| PANTHER ESCROW ISSUER LLC 144A 0.28% | WELLS FARGO + CO 3.41% |
| SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.28% | MORGAN STANLEY 3.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | US high yield bonds | Financials |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +7.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | 1326 | 79 |
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
XLF in plain words
XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or XLF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or XLF?
- HYG charges 0.49% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against XLF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hyg-vs-xlf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources