Which returned more over the last year, HGER or MBB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +52.8% and MBB returned −0.1%, so HGER returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, HGER or MBB?

HGER charges 0.68% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HGER vs MBB: how they differ

HGER and MBB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned more over the year.

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF and iShares MBS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HGER	Only in MBB
United States Treasury 17.98%	BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 7.26%
United States Treasury 17.65%	GNMA2 SF 30YR 0.09%
United States Treasury 17.49%	GNMA II 30YR SF - JUMBO-CONFORMING 0.08%
United States Treasury 16.56%	GNMA2 SINGLE FAMILY 30YR 0.04%
United States Treasury 13.97%	GNMA II 30YR 0.03%
United States Treasury 12.50%	GNMA2 30YR TBA(REG C) 0.03%
United States Treasury 3.85%	UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.03%
	FNMA 30YR UMBS MEGA REMIC SUPER 0.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

HGER and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Harbor	iShares
What it is	Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy	Mbs
Total return, 1 year	+52.8%	−0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+35.3 pts	−17.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.68%	0.04%
Holdings	7	2599

HGER in plain words

HGER is an index equity fund tracking the Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or MBB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +52.8% and MBB returned −0.1%, so HGER returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HGER or MBB?: HGER charges 0.68% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HGER against MBB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HGER against MBB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/hger-vs-mbb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources