Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to MOAT's +10.3%; 12% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and MOAT

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNDX costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.6 points.

FNDX vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXMOAT
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+10.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyMorningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.46%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026$27.6bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common12%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returns
FNDX MOAT
Return
Total return edge FNDX (slight) +418.7% +410.1%
Annualized edge Tie +13.3% +13.1%
Price return edge MOAT (slight) +298.9% +330.6%
Risk
Volatility edge FNDX (slight) 15.9% 17.4%
Max drawdown edge MOAT −35.2% −30.8%
Downside capture 92.1% 100.0%
Beta 0.93 0.98
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FNDX (slight) 0.74 0.69
Sortino edge FNDX (slight) 1.05 1.01
Treynor 0.128 0.130
Calmar edge MOAT 0.38 0.43
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.4% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.28 −0.06
Information ratio −0.10 −0.05
Tracking error 5.3% 7.6%

Each against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FNDX returned slightly more: +418.7% to +410.1%. FNDX swung slightly less: 15.9% to 17.4%. MOAT fell less at its worst: −30.8% to −35.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FNDX vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXMOATEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+418.7%+410.1%FNDX (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.3%+13.1%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+298.9%+330.6%MOAT (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.9%17.4%FNDX (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%11.9%FNDX (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−35.2%−30.8%MOATDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture86.4%98.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture92.1%100.0%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.98Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.900.81Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.69FNDX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.051.01FNDX (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1280.130Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.43MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBVOOThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.4% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.28−0.06Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +3.2%−4.0% to +3.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.10−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.3%7.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

12%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and MOAT hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

12% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX MOAT
Microsoft Corp 2.82% 2.81%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80% 1.21%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.21% 2.48%
Alphabet Inc 1.78% 1.18%
NVIDIA Corp 0.63% 2.38%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 0.59% 1.28%
Broadcom Inc 0.48% 2.19%
PepsiCo Inc 0.40% 1.10%
Applied Materials Inc 0.39% 1.08%
Walt Disney Co 0.38% 1.29%
Lockheed Martin Corp 0.37% 1.47%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.34% 1.48%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.45%
Intel Corp 1.42%
Alphabet Inc 1.41%
Only in MOAT
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Veeva Systems Inc 2.17%
Fair Isaac Corp 1.59%
Guidewire Software Inc 1.54%
Nxp Semiconductors Nv 1.38%
Entegris Inc 1.34%
Mercadolibre Inc 1.21%
Rollins Inc 1.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Schwab VanEck
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +10.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB −3.4 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 88.4% 91.6%
Holdings 731 54
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 $27.6bn $11.6bn

FNDX and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0CB82A5AF9

FNDX and MOAT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 12% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and MOAT +10.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or MOAT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and MOAT +10.3%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or MOAT?
FNDX is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of FNDX and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against MOAT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-moat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.