Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs IWF: how they differ
FDVV and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDVV | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | APPLE 7.77% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | MICROSOFT 5.55% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | High Dividend | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 96 | 315 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and IWF returned +7.0%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or IWF?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources