Data as of Sep 19, 2026.
FBTC vs VCIT: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and VCIT a bond index fund, and over the year VCIT returned more, −0.8% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | −0.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | −17.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 2332 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $70.0bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
VCIT in plain words
VCIT tracks an index of Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or VCIT?
- In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and VCIT returned −0.8%, so VCIT returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or VCIT?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and VCIT charges 0.03%, so VCIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against VCIT, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-vcit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources