Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or QQQM?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and QQQM returned +21.7%, so QQQM returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or QQQM?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs QQQM: how they differ

ETHA and QQQM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ETHA and QQQM both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ETHA	QQQM
USD CASH	0.00%	-0.00%

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in QQQM
ETHER 100.00%	NVIDIA Corp 8.54%
	Apple Inc 7.83%
	Microsoft Corp 5.81%
	Micron Technology Inc 5.01%
	Amazon.com Inc 4.33%
	Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.99%
	Alphabet Inc 3.23%
	Meta Platforms Inc 3.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.

ETHA and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+21.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	+5.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.15%
Holdings	2	107
Net assets	$9.2bn	$105.7bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

QQQM in plain words

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 107 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or QQQM?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and QQQM returned +21.7%, so QQQM returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or QQQM?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against QQQM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against QQQM, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-qqqm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources