Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and ONEQ returned +19.2%, so ONEQ returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or ONEQ?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs ONEQ: how they differ

ETHA and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in ONEQ
ETHER 100.00%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
USD CASH 0.00%	APPLE INC 10.04%
	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks the Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+19.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	+2.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.21%
Holdings	2	1022
Net assets	$9.2bn	$10.8bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and ONEQ returned +19.2%, so ONEQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or ONEQ?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against ONEQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources