Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
ETHA vs PDBC: how they differ
ETHA and PDBC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PDBC returned more over the year.
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ETHA | Only in PDBC |
|---|---|
| ETHER 100.00% | Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio 81.58% |
| USD CASH 0.00% | POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
| ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Holds ether | Actively managed |
| Total return, 1 year | −42.6% | +52.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −59.2 pts | +36.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.59% |
| Holdings | 2 | 2 |
| Net assets | $9.2bn | $7.9bn |
ETHA in plain words
ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +52.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or PDBC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and PDBC returned +52.6%, so PDBC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, ETHA or PDBC?
- ETHA charges 0.25% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against PDBC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources