Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or IWF?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and IWF returned +6.6%, so IWF returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or IWF?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs IWF: how they differ

ETHA and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ETHA and IWF both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ETHA	IWF
USD CASH	0.00%	-0.11%

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in IWF
ETHER 100.00%	NVIDIA 15.47%
	APPLE 7.86%
	ALPHABET CLASS A 6.08%
	MICROSOFT 5.47%
	BROADCOM INC 4.97%
	ALPHABET CLASS C 4.89%
	META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.57%
	MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks the Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−10.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.18%
Holdings	2	375
Net assets	$9.2bn	$125.8bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

IWF in plain words

IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 375 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or IWF?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and IWF returned +6.6%, so IWF returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or IWF?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against IWF, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources