Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or ILF?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and ILF returned +28.1%, so ILF returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or ILF?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs ILF: how they differ

ETHA and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ETHA and ILF both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ETHA	ILF
USD CASH	0.00%	1.11%

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in ILF
ETHER 100.00%	NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.95%
	VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 7.43%
	ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.78%
	PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.35%
	PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.92%
	GRUPO MEXICO B 5.85%
	GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.15%
	CREDICORP LTD 3.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Holds ether	Tracks an index of Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+28.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	+11.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.47%
Holdings	2	56
Net assets	$9.2bn	$3.9bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

ILF in plain words

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +28.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 54.5%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or ILF?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and ILF returned +28.1%, so ILF returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or ILF?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against ILF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against ILF, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources