Which returned more over the last year, EMB or RSP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and RSP returned +14.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or RSP?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs RSP: how they differ

EMB and RSP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in RSP
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	Moderna Inc 0.58%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	Veeva Systems Inc 0.31%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	Zebra Technologies Corp 0.31%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.29%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	Valero Energy Corp 0.29%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	Charles River Laboratories International 0.28%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	Phillips 66 0.28%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	Salesforce Inc 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−2.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.20%
Holdings	612	506

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or RSP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and RSP returned +14.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or RSP?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against RSP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-rsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources