Which returned more over the last year, EMB or MTUM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or MTUM?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs MTUM: how they differ

EMB and MTUM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and MTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in MTUM
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	SANDISK 3.10%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	MSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+4.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	612	128

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or MTUM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or MTUM?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against MTUM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-mtum Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources