Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
EDV vs FBTC: how they differ
EDV is a bond index fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year EDV returned more, −8.1% against −31.0%.
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Fidelity |
| What it is | Tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | −8.1% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −24.7 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 83 | not filed |
| Net assets | $3.7bn | $13.9bn |
EDV in plain words
EDV tracks an index of Extended Duration Treasury. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −8.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 56.8% below its high of Mar 9, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EDV or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EDV returned −8.1% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so EDV returned more.
- Which is cheaper, EDV or FBTC?
- EDV charges 0.05% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so EDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EDV against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/edv-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources