Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or SCHG?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and SCHG returned +12.1%, so SCHG returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or SCHG?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs SCHG: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and SCHG an equity index fund, and over the year SCHG returned more, +12.1% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

FBTC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	Schwab
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+12.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−4.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.04%
Holdings	not filed	197
Net assets	$13.9bn	$61.1bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or SCHG?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and SCHG returned +12.1%, so SCHG returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or SCHG?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against SCHG, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-schg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources