Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRO vs FDVV: how they differ
DGRO and FDVV hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DGRO | Only in FDVV |
|---|---|
| MICROSOFT 3.45% | NVIDIA CORP 6.86% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20% | APPLE INC 5.70% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07% | BROADCOM INC 3.50% |
| APPLE 3.04% | JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% |
| ABBVIE 3.02% | ALPHABET INC 2.21% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.38% | COCA COLA CO 1.85% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16% | PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Core Dividend Growth | High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.7% | 86.7% |
| Holdings | 387 | 96 |
DGRO in plain words
DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or FDVV?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRO or FDVV?
- DGRO charges 0.08% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRO and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against FDVV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-fdvv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources