Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRO vs EEM: how they differ
DGRO and EEM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRO | EEM |
|---|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY | 0.06% | 0.39% |
| BECTON DICKINSON | 0.29% | 0.02% |
| CASH COLLATERAL USD UBFUT | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| TE CONNECTIVITY PLC | 0.20% | 0.01% |
| Only in DGRO | Only in EEM |
|---|---|
| MICROSOFT 3.45% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.18% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 7.46% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20% | SK HYNIX 6.07% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07% | TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.65% |
| APPLE 3.04% | ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82% |
| ABBVIE 3.02% | MEDIATEK 1.71% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.38% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.97% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core Dividend Growth | Emerging markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +32.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | +14.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.72% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.7% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 387 | 965 |
DGRO in plain words
DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 965 positions, with the top ten at 38.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or EEM?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRO or EEM?
- DGRO charges 0.08% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRO and EEM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of EEM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against EEM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-eem Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources