Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs IWF: how they differ
COWZ and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| TechnipFMC PLC | 0.58% | 0.04% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | NVIDIA 15.46% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | APPLE 7.77% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | ALPHABET CLASS A 5.88% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | MICROSOFT 5.55% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | BROADCOM INC 5.10% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | ALPHABET CLASS C 4.77% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.52% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 3.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | iShares |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 100 | 315 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 315 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and IWF returned +7.0%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or IWF?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against IWF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources