Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs IWF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to IWF's +0.9%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and IWF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWF costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.5 points; IWF is 6.4 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +0.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $124.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 57.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IWF hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IWF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and IWF +0.9%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or IWF?
- IWF is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against IWF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against IWF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwf
[COWZ against IWF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iwf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.