Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs IBIT: how they differ

COWZ and IBIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IBIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in COWZOnly in IBIT
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%BITCOIN 100.00%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%USD CASH 0.00%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

COWZ and IBIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerPaceriShares
What it isTracks an index of US Cash Cows 100Holds bitcoin
Total return, 1 year+22.7%−31.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+16.6%+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500+6.2 pts−47.6 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.25%
Holdings1002
Net assets$18.2bn$63.7bn

COWZ in plain words

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +22.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IBIT?
In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +22.7% and IBIT returned −31.1%, so COWZ returned more.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or IBIT?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IBIT charges 0.25%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against IBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against IBIT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-ibit Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources