Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs IWC: how they differ

CGBL and IWC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWC returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and IWC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in IWC
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%CAREDX 0.61%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%SELLAS LIFE SCIENCES GROUP INC 0.60%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%NURIX THERAPEUTICS 0.59%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%PENGUIN SOLUTIONS INC 0.58%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%OUSTER 0.52%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%VIRIDIAN THERAPEUTICS ORS 0.48%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%INTERFACE 0.47%
Apple Inc 2.00%MBX BIOSCIENCES 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

CGBL and IWC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapital GroupiShares
What it isCore BalancedRussell Microcap
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+31.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts+13.8 pts
Expense ratio0.33%not published
Already in the S&P 50048.1%91.9%
Holdings771252

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

IWC in plain words

IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1252 positions, with the top ten at 5.1%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or IWC?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and IWC returned +31.3%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do CGBL and IWC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 92% of IWC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against IWC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against IWC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgbl-vs-iwc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources