Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VYM vs XRT: how they differ

VYM and XRT hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VYM and XRT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VYM and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVYMXRT
Target Corp0.25%1.38%
eBay Inc0.20%1.42%
Kroger Co/The0.17%1.17%
Dollar General Corp0.11%1.42%
Tractor Supply Co0.08%1.39%
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc0.06%1.43%
Best Buy Co Inc0.05%1.36%
Albertsons Cos Inc0.03%1.20%
Gap Inc/The0.02%1.20%
Macy's Inc0.02%1.38%
Bath & Body Works Inc0.02%1.73%
Advance Auto Parts Inc0.01%1.42%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VYMOnly in XRT
Broadcom Inc 8.07%Groupon Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Johnson & Johnson 2.31%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Caterpillar Inc 1.73%Coupang Inc 1.55%
AbbVie Inc 1.57%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Chevron Corp 1.51%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VYM and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isUS high dividendSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50092.2%22.5%
Holdings60875

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VYM or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VYM returned +17.6% and XRT returned −3.0%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VYM or XRT?
VYM charges 0.04% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VYM and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of VYM and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VYM against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VYM against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VYM-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources