Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VYM: how they differ

ACWI and VYM hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VYM hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVYM
BROADCOM INC.1.90%8.07%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.0.86%3.36%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%2.73%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%2.31%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%1.73%
ABBVIE INC.0.38%1.57%
CHEVRON CORPORATION0.37%1.51%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.36%1.45%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.36%1.52%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.35%1.45%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED0.34%1.41%
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.0.33%1.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VYM
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Albemarle Corp 0.10%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Ovintiv Inc 0.07%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Southwest Airlines Co 0.07%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Amcor PLC 0.07%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%East West Bancorp Inc 0.07%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Viatris Inc 0.07%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%DT Midstream Inc 0.06%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Prc Newco Inc 0.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%92.2%
Holdings2307608

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VYM returned +17.6%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VYM?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources