Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VPU vs VYM: how they differ

VPU and VYM hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VYM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Utilities Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VPU and VYM hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VPU and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVPUVYM
NextEra Energy Inc11.84%0.85%
Southern Co/The6.70%0.45%
Duke Energy Corp6.31%0.42%
American Electric Power Co Inc4.47%0.31%
Sempra3.85%0.26%
Dominion Energy Inc3.78%0.23%
Entergy Corp3.22%0.22%
Xcel Energy Inc3.11%0.20%
Exelon Corp3.05%0.20%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc2.60%0.17%
Consolidated Edison Inc2.52%0.17%
WEC Energy Group Inc2.39%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VPUOnly in VYM
Constellation Energy Corp 5.86%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Vistra Corp 3.59%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
PG&E Corp 2.37%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Talen Energy Corp 0.99%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Ormat Technologies Inc 0.44%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Oklo Inc 0.39%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc 0.15%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
NextEra Energy Partners LP 0.07%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VPU and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isUtilitiesUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+2.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.4 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50090.1%92.2%
Holdings66608

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VPU or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPU returned +2.1% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VYM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VPU or VYM?
VPU charges 0.09% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VPU and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of VPU and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VPU against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VPU against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VPU-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources