Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VPU: how they differ

ACWI and VPU hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VPU hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VPU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVPU
NEXTERA ENERGY, INC.0.20%11.84%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY0.11%6.70%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION0.10%6.31%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION.0.10%5.86%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.0.07%4.47%
SEMPRA0.06%3.85%
VISTRA CORP.0.06%3.59%
Dominion Energy, Inc.0.05%3.78%
ENTERGY CORPORATION0.05%3.22%
Xcel Energy Inc.0.05%3.11%
EXELON CORPORATION0.05%3.05%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.0.04%2.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VPU
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Talen Energy Corp 0.99%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Pinnacle West Capital Corp 0.79%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%AES Corp/The 0.69%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Essential Utilities Inc 0.69%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%OGE Energy Corp 0.64%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%IDACORP Inc 0.50%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%UGI Corp 0.50%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%National Fuel Gas Co 0.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIUtilities
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+2.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%90.1%
Holdings230766

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VPU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VPU returned +2.1%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VPU?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so VPU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources