Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VHT vs VYM: how they differ

VHT and VYM hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

Vanguard Health Care Index Fund and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VHT and VYM hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VHT and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVHTVYM
Johnson & Johnson8.48%2.31%
AbbVie Inc6.10%1.57%
UnitedHealth Group Inc5.46%1.41%
Merck & Co Inc4.67%1.14%
Amgen Inc2.87%0.72%
Gilead Sciences Inc2.64%0.68%
Abbott Laboratories2.36%0.66%
Pfizer Inc2.36%0.64%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co1.84%0.52%
CVS Health Corp1.83%0.44%
Medtronic PLC1.50%0.43%
Elevance Health Inc1.35%0.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VHTOnly in VYM
Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Danaher Corp 1.84%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.80%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
Stryker Corp 1.66%Chevron Corp 1.51%
McKesson Corp 1.45%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
Boston Scientific Corp 1.14%Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

VHT and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isHealth CareUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50085.6%92.2%
Holdings401608

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VHT or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VHT returned +21.6% and VYM returned +17.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VHT or VYM?
VHT charges 0.09% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VHT and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of VHT and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VHT against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VHT against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VHT-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources