Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VHT: how they differ

ACWI and VHT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VHT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVHT
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.76%14.07%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%8.48%
ABBVIE INC.0.38%6.10%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED0.34%5.46%
MERCK & CO., INC.0.27%4.67%
AMGEN INC.0.19%2.87%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED0.18%2.93%
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.0.16%2.64%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.0.16%2.39%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.16%2.36%
PFIZER INC.0.15%2.36%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY0.12%1.84%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VHT
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Viatris Inc 0.30%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Tenet Healthcare Corp 0.24%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Guardant Health Inc 0.23%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Moderna Inc 0.23%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC 0.20%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Exelixis Inc 0.20%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Align Technology Inc 0.19%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Elanco Animal Health Inc 0.19%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%85.6%
Holdings2307401

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VHT?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources