Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VEU vs VWO: how they differ

VEU and VWO hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and VEU returned more over the year.

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VEU and VWO hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VEU and VWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVEUVWO
Tencent Holdings Ltd0.97%3.28%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd0.76%2.57%
Delta Electronics Inc0.35%1.18%
MediaTek Inc0.32%1.07%
Reliance Industries Ltd0.27%0.90%
HDFC Bank Ltd0.24%0.81%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd0.22%0.75%
PDD Holdings Inc0.20%0.66%
ICICI Bank Ltd0.18%0.62%
Bharti Airtel Ltd0.15%0.52%
Vale SA0.15%0.51%
Meituan0.15%0.50%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VEUOnly in VWO
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.83%Macronix International Co Ltd 0.08%
ASML Holding NV 1.45%WinWay Technology Co Ltd 0.07%
SK hynix Inc 1.24%Taiwan Union Technology Corp 0.07%
HSBC Holdings PLC 0.81%Compeq Manufacturing Co Ltd 0.07%
AstraZeneca PLC 0.73%LandMark Optoelectronics Corp 0.06%
Novartis AG 0.73%Kinsus Interconnect Technology Corp 0.05%
Nestle SA 0.67%ADATA Technology Co Ltd 0.04%
Shell PLC 0.67%XtalPi Holdings Ltd 0.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

VEU and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund
VWO
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardVanguard
What it isFTSE All-World ex-USEmerging markets
Total return, 1 year+22.9%+15.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.4 pts−1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings38606355

VEU in plain words

VEU is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex-US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3860 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%.

VWO in plain words

VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VEU or VWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VEU returned +22.9% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VEU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VEU or VWO?
VEU charges 0.04% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VEU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VEU and VWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VEU and 0% of VWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VEU against VWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VEU against VWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VEU-VWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources