Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs VEU: how they differ

ACWX and VEU hold 14% of their weight in the same names.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and VEU hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWX and VEU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWXVEU
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.69%0.65%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.50%0.47%
Allianz SE0.47%0.45%
Siemens Energy AG0.45%0.41%
SHOPIFY INC.0.41%0.38%
UBS Group AG0.39%0.36%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.32%0.28%
BANK OF MONTREAL0.29%0.28%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE0.28%0.27%
GSK PLC0.29%0.27%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.28%0.27%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED0.27%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWXOnly in VEU
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.83%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.54%ASML Holding NV 1.45%
SK hynix Inc. 1.33%SK hynix Inc 1.24%
Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.97%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.81%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.76%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79%AstraZeneca PLC 0.73%
Novartis AG 0.77%Novartis AG 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWX and VEU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWI ex U.S.FTSE All-World ex-US
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings17593860

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.

VEU in plain words

VEU is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex-US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3860 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or VEU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and VEU returned +22.9%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or VEU?
ACWX charges 0.32% a year and VEU charges 0.04%, so VEU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWX and VEU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of VEU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against VEU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against VEU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-VEU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources