Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VWO: how they differ

ACWI and VWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVWO
America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V.0.02%0.18%
State Bank of India0.02%0.03%
YUM CHINA HOLDINGS, INC.0.02%0.02%
Global Unichip Corp0.01%0.10%
Divi's Laboratories Ltd0.01%0.08%
Piraeus Bank SA0.01%0.09%
Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC0.01%0.08%
Vibra Energia S.A.0.01%0.07%
Zhongji Innolight Co Ltd0.01%0.03%
SASOL LIMITED0.01%0.08%
eMemory Technology Inc0.01%0.07%
Banco de Chile0.01%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VWO
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 14.73%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Tencent Holdings Ltd 3.28%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.57%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Delta Electronics Inc 1.18%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%MediaTek Inc 1.07%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Reliance Industries Ltd 0.90%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%HDFC Bank Ltd 0.81%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VWO
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWIEmerging markets
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+15.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%0.0%
Holdings23076355

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VWO in plain words

VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VWO returned +15.6%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VWO?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 0% of VWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources