Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPMO vs XLF: how they differ

SPMO and XLF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and XLF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPMO and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPMOXLF
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)1.43%3.94%
Citigroup Inc.0.97%3.15%
Morgan Stanley0.96%3.31%
Charles Schwab Corp. (The)0.55%1.99%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The)0.50%1.31%
CME Group Inc.0.41%1.06%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.0.30%1.05%
State Street Corp.0.17%0.62%
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.0.15%0.34%
Northern Trust Corp.0.12%0.42%
Loews Corp.0.07%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPMOOnly in XLF
Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Broadcom Inc. 7.58%Visa Inc 7.51%
Alphabet Inc. 4.81%Mastercard Inc 5.47%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Johnson & Johnson 3.85%Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Alphabet Inc. 3.81%American Express Co 2.38%
Lam Research Corp. 3.54%Blackrock Inc 1.83%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPMO and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isS&P 500 MomentumFinancials
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings9976

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or XLF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and XLF returned +7.6%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or XLF?
SPMO charges 0.13% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPMO against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources