Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPMO vs VYM: how they differ

SPMO and VYM hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and VYM hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPMO and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPMOVYM
Broadcom Inc.7.58%8.07%
Exxon Mobil Corp.2.78%2.73%
Johnson & Johnson3.85%2.31%
Caterpillar Inc.2.60%1.73%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.02%1.52%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)1.21%1.28%
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)1.43%1.08%
Philip Morris International Inc.1.29%1.08%
RTX Corp.1.40%0.99%
Morgan Stanley0.96%0.91%
Citigroup Inc.0.97%0.89%
Analog Devices, Inc.0.81%0.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPMOOnly in VYM
Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Alphabet Inc. 4.81%Chevron Corp 1.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
Alphabet Inc. 3.81%Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45%
Lam Research Corp. 3.54%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.41%
Intel Corp. 2.95%Home Depot Inc/The 1.37%
Sandisk Corp. 2.46%Oracle Corp 1.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SPMO and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 MomentumUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.04%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%92.2%
Holdings99608

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and VYM returned +17.6%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or VYM?
SPMO charges 0.13% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPMO against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPMO-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources