Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPHQ vs XLY: how they differ
SPHQ and XLY hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPHQ and XLY hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPHQ | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 1.79% | 3.93% |
| eBay Inc. | 0.66% | 1.24% |
| Airbnb, Inc. | 0.60% | 1.49% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. | 0.32% | 0.73% |
| Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.68% |
| Ulta Beauty, Inc. | 0.22% | 0.49% |
| NVR, Inc. | 0.17% | 0.46% |
| Deckers Outdoor Corp. | 0.16% | 0.35% |
| Ralph Lauren Corp. | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. | 0.12% | 0.37% |
| Only in SPHQ | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| Costco Wholesale Corp. 4.82% | Amazon.com Inc 22.24% |
| Visa Inc. 4.69% | Tesla Inc 19.66% |
| Apple Inc. 4.51% | Home Depot Inc/The 5.83% |
| Mastercard Inc. 4.32% | McDonald's Corp 4.16% |
| General Electric Co. 4.16% | Booking Holdings Inc 3.44% |
| Lam Research Corp. 4.10% | Lowe's Cos Inc 3.08% |
| Caterpillar Inc. 3.78% | Starbucks Corp 2.90% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54% | Marriott International Inc/MD 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 Quality | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 99 | 47 |
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPHQ or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHQ returned +17.4% and XLY returned −4.1%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPHQ or XLY?
- SPHQ charges 0.15% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPHQ and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPHQ and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHQ against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SPHQ-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources